Miscellany Central

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Overruling abortion rights could have much broader implications on Americans’ liberty

Overruling abortion rights could have much broader implications on Americans’ liberty

By Jennifer Rubin
Columnist|
Today at 12:00 p.m. EST

In anticipation of the Supreme Court’s hearing on Wednesday to consider Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks, there has been much conversation about what will happen if the court’s conservatives overrule abortion rights cemented in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In fact, the implications of such a ruling would go far beyond just abortion.


In Casey, the Supreme Court formulated an “undue burden” test to limit state regulation of abortion up to viability of a fetus, replacing the trimester formulation under Roe. But Casey also left a long trail of case law that has become legal precedent for decades.


Charles Fried, who served as solicitor general under President Ronald Reagan, offered a concise reminder of the broader implications in a New York Times op-ed. Casey, he writes, put the right to abortion “on a firmer constitutional basis: the dignity and autonomy of the pregnant woman and the equal rights of women more generally.” He warns:


Story continues below advertisement

Since that time, Casey had been cited and used as a basis of constitutional reasoning in many decisions in many areas of the law, including gay rights and the parental rights of a surviving parent. The decision has not only taken root; it has flourished and ramified.

To overturn Roe now would be an act of constitutional vandalism — not conservative, but reactionary.

The text of Casey is striking in that it enunciates a huge scope of constitutional protections. Protection for access to abortion, the court affirmed, “derives from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It declares that no State shall ‘deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.’” The court emphasized, “The controlling word in the cases before us is ‘liberty.’”


Decades of constitutional law reiterate that rights protected by the 14th Amendment were not limited to those specifically delineated in the Constitution. The protections of the 14th Amendment create “a realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter.” That is the central holding of Casey: Abortion is contained within that realm, and it extends to a host of decisions that reflect one’s individual autonomy, dignity and self-determination.


“These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment,” the court held. “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. Beliefs about these matters could not define the attributes of personhood were they formed under compulsion of the State.”


That protection extends not only to marriage, the court held in Casey (and later in Obergefell v. Hodges for same-sex couples), but also to “procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.” The right to home-school your child? The right to cohabitate with family members? The right to buy birth control? The right to have as many children as one sees fit? Pull on the string to unravel Casey, and rights that all Americans, from the most conservative to the most progressive, take for granted could come undone.


Story continues below advertisement

Texas’s antiabortion law received such an overwhelmingly negative reaction — even among those who consider themselves “pro-life" — because it violated the dignity, respect, privacy and humanity of women who would be subject to spying and abuse for the sake of a $10,000 bounty.


You're following Jennifer Rubin‘s opinionsFollowing

The decision whether to carry a pregnancy to term, Casey held, is “too intimate and personal for the State to insist, without more, upon its own vision of the woman’s role, however dominant that vision has been in the course of our history and our culture. The destiny of the woman must be shaped to a large extent on her own conception of her spiritual imperatives and her place in society.” To compel a woman to complete her pregnancy against her will is to rob her of an essential component of her humanity.


That is what is at stake with a potential override of Casey. And if abortion does not meet one’s personal definition of a decision “too intimate and personal” for the state to be involved with, perhaps the right to make decisions about one’s health or the education of their children does.


Story continues below advertisement

Abortion rights advocates, court watchers and the media more generally err in defining the stakes of overturning Casey too narrowly. And it is an insult to people’s intelligence to say it is about “returning” abortion decisions to the “people”; it is about robbing women of a decision central to their personhood and denying them the right to self-determination. If that is what the right-wing Supreme Court is after, the justices should be clear about the awesome power of the state they are unleashing on Americans.


Posted by Tony Lee at 12:05 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2025 (26)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2024 (376)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (40)
    • ►  July (67)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (33)
    • ►  March (28)
    • ►  February (50)
    • ►  January (44)
  • ►  2023 (528)
    • ►  December (59)
    • ►  November (45)
    • ►  October (58)
    • ►  September (62)
    • ►  August (51)
    • ►  July (63)
    • ►  June (38)
    • ►  May (44)
    • ►  April (32)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2022 (676)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (60)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (38)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (44)
    • ►  April (57)
    • ►  March (106)
    • ►  February (107)
    • ►  January (90)
  • ▼  2021 (1305)
    • ▼  December (120)
      • It's the end of the year as we know it
      • Predictions are hard
      • ‘An American Tradition’: Lessons from a year cover...
      • Most evangelical objections to vaccines have nothi...
      • My favorite movies of 2021
      • Why Wokeism Will Rule the World
      • Charles Mills' "Black Wrong, White Rights"
      • On Biden initiatives, Republicans like to have the...
      • The anatomy of a sanctions failure
      • The War on Jewish Christmas must be stopped
      • Opinion | The ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ Oregonian, a New ...
      • You're Probably Not Using the Web's Best Browser
      • The Difference Between Theatrical and Extended Edi...
      • Surprisingly, there has been a redistricting turna...
      • Enough despair. We cannot be victims of excessive ...
      • The problem with performative centrism
      • Perspective | Abortion will remain a national issu...
      • President Biden is failing on covid-19
      • Perspective | Here’s how Democrats can fix the Bui...
      • How Republicans will retcon the past to try to ree...
      • Human history in the very long run
      • Don’t Despair About U.S. Democracy. Fix It.
      • Don't close schools
      • How one health reporter cut through the noise on o...
      • How the left forced Biden’s hand on student loans
      • $1.75 trillion is plenty of money to write a good ...
      • Biden delivered his best speech on covid-19 yet
      • The most dangerous conservative judges aren’t on t...
      • The real reason the right hates Anthony Fauci
      • Biden Can Promise Action, But Omicron Is in Charge...
      • Opinion | Republicans gear up for a torrent of Ben...
      • The filibuster debate still hasn’t happened in the...
      • Opinion: The alternative to Supreme Court enlargem...
      • The trend against religious affiliation is a grave...
      • 3 retired generals: The military must prepare now ...
      • Sarah Palin’s anti-vax talk shows Republicans have...
      • Don’t Count Out Manchin’s Vote Just Yet
      • Nobody is acting like they believe the future of d...
      • Build Back Better Can Come Back Better Than Ever
      • The red covid wave is here
      • The case against "creating jobs"
      • ‘We are closer to civil war than any of us would l...
      • Ten minutes of dishonest fury, presented to an aud...
      • Ten minutes of dishonest fury, presented to an aud...
      • U.S. Democracy Faces Real Threats
      • Donald Trump’s Megaphone
      • Trump still texts me constantly, like a bad ex-boy...
      • What if the eventual Jan. 6 report is rigorous, co...
      • A Fox News defector gets it right on Laura Ingraha...
      • A Biden Revival? Possibly.
      • Omicron looks pretty scary
      • Jan. 6 wasn’t an insurrection. It was vigilantism....
      • The Supreme Court is taking suspect science seriou...
      • Republicans: Give us what we want, or we crash the...
      • Fox News hosts grew alarmed about Jan. 6 — after f...
      • With nearly 800,000 U.S. covid deaths, what’s keep...
      • Conservatives may control the Supreme Court until ...
      • How Joe Manchin and Republicans are wrecking our m...
      • The lawyer behind the Trump coup memo unmasks the ...
      • The bulldogs of Benghazi roll over for insurrectio...
      • Omicron variant more resistant to vaccines but cau...
      • Will Republicans really stop Democrats from loweri...
      • Mark Meadows’s coverup of Trump’s coup attempt is ...
      • Ron DeSantis is paving his path to the White House...
      • Trump’s PowerPoint coup plotters were crackpots. W...
      • California’s math detracking initiative seems pret...
      • THIS WEEK INSIDE THE BIG TENT Dec. 10
      • Republicans blame Biden for inflation. So what’s t...
      • The damage done by Joe Manchin is likely to get mu...
      • ‘The Internet Is on Fire’
      • No one in their right mind would design a governme...
      • For legal and ethical guidance on abortion, let’s ...
      • Here comes the next phony GOP attack on the Biden ...
      • The Supreme Court is on a religious crusade
      • Mark Meadows’s new effort to cover up Trump’s coup...
      • In Jan. 6 Probe, Crimes Matter More Than Coverups
      • Lawmakers who fret about spending quietly pass hun...
      • Believe it or not, Fox News once knew shame
      • GOP senators make a powerful case against GOP cont...
      • The big, ugly truth that Biden cannot conceal from...
      • Democracy isn’t ‘backsliding.’ Equality is
      • 'The Case Against Abortion' Is Weak
      • Can Democrats sell Biden’s agenda? New ads test a ...
      • How Devin Nunes’s new media job for Trump explains...
      • An angry rift between Trump and Bannon signals the...
      • Why Biden Is Getting Bad Press
      • Merrick Garland’s Texas lawsuit shows the war on d...
      • The CDC's vaccine data is all wrong
      • Why international election observers would give Wi...
      • A GOP lawyer issues a frantic warning to his own p...
      • The White backlash targeting schools is only growing
      • Rep. Boebert labels Rep. Omar a jihadist. Why don’...
      • How is the GOP’s coronavirus recklessness compatib...
      • The Omicron situation, Week 2
      • What is the goal of child care policy?
      • わけではない OR わけがない
      • The Political Economy of Reaction
      • We may have already missed our last, best chance t...
      • It’s time to say it: The conservatives on the Supr...
      • Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene aren’t f...
    • ►  November (115)
    • ►  October (145)
    • ►  September (108)
    • ►  August (106)
    • ►  July (142)
    • ►  June (101)
    • ►  May (74)
    • ►  April (120)
    • ►  March (139)
    • ►  February (100)
    • ►  January (35)
  • ►  2020 (340)
    • ►  December (34)
    • ►  November (60)
    • ►  October (66)
    • ►  September (56)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2019 (347)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (31)
    • ►  September (39)
    • ►  August (37)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (33)
    • ►  May (37)
    • ►  April (35)
    • ►  March (37)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2018 (95)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2017 (19)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (9)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (6)
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.