newrepublic.com
The New Face of Men’s Rights
By Jeet Heer
6-7 minutes
October 3, 2018
Trump and other Republicans say Brett Kavanaugh is being victimized
by #MeToo—and they're expressing male solidarity in defending him.
The Trump men are very worried about the fate of their kind. Before
he boarded Air Force One on Tuesday, President Donald Trump was asked by a
reporter, “What do you say to young men in America?” He replied, “Well, I’d say
that it’s a very scary time for young men in America when you can be guilty of
something you may not be guilty of.” Asked if he had a message for young women,
he said, “Women are doing great.”
Trump was echoing the words of his eldest son, who the previous day
told an interviewer, “I’ve got boys and I’ve got girls and when I see what’s
going on now, it’s scary for all things.” Asked if he feared more for his
daughters or his sons, Trump Jr. said, “Right now, I’d say my sons.”
The context of these comments is the increasingly fraught nomination
of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court. In addition to the multiple
accusations of sexual assault against him, there are now other objections that
are less severe, but perhaps enough to sink his bid. These include claims that
he lied to or misled the Senate under oath, that he was not simply the studious
scholar-athlete he portrayed himself to be, and that in defending himself in
last week’s hearing he displayed an anger and partisan resentment unbecoming of
a judge, let alone one aspiring for a seat in the highest court in the land.
In response, Republicans and other Kavanaugh supporters have recast
their defense of him in broader terms. Not only has Kavanaugh been wronged,
they argue, but his treatment by his opponents and the media shows how any man
could be victimized in the age of #MeToo. The fight over the Supreme Court
nominee’s confirmation thus has become a trial over masculinity itself.
This turn of events is consistent with the Republican Party’s own
brand of identity politics of late, in which men, rather than women, are
portrayed as the beleaguered gender in American society.
“The sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett
M. Kavanaugh have sparked a wave of unbridled anger and anxiety from many
Republican men, who say they are in danger of being swept up by false accusers
who are biased against them,” Philip Rucker and Robert Costa wrote in The
Washington Post. “From President Trump to his namesake son to Sen. Lindsey O.
Graham (R-S.C.), the howls of outrage crystallize a strong current of grievance
within a party whose leadership is almost entirely white and overwhelmingly
male—and which does not make a secret of its fear that demographic shifts and
cultural convulsions could jeopardize its grip on power.”
Many of the right’s defenses of Kavanaugh are premised on the idea
that, in his furious defiance, he is only doing what any man would do if
falsely accused. “If I was traipsed in front of the Senate on bogus charges and
forced to answer deeply personal and embarrassing questions about my high
school antics, maybe out of embarrassment and anger I might be less than
truthful,” Matt Walsh tweeted. In short: Wounded male pride justifies lying
under oath.
When The New York Times reported that Kavanaugh, as an undergraduate
at Yale, was involved in a bar fight, it provoked an “I am Spartacus” moment on
Twitter where, as in the ending of the 1960 Stanley Kubrick film, a
conservative throng emerged to express solidarity.
Tweet follows:
Ive been in dozens of bar
fights (ask the guys I grew up with) nearly lost an eye in one and that's just
one of the injuries (I have the scarred stitch marks to prove the rest) never
been black out drunk but I have had to defend myself, which I am still
perfectly capable of doing https://t.co/VQSotGWW5g
— Charles Gasparino
(@CGasparino) October 2, 2018
Tweet follows:
I don’t know one guy,
including myself, who wasn’t in a bar fight.
Not a single one.
— John Cardillo
(@johncardillo) October 2, 2018
This defense shows how easily identity-based expressions of
solidarity can minimize misconduct. It’s a variation of the boys-will-boys
excuse that is sometimes trotted out to dismiss sexual misconduct by teens and
young men. It also obscures the specifics of the case. Few would argue that
Kavanaugh’s bar fight alone is disqualifying for a Supreme Court nominee.
Rather, the bar fight is important because it contradicts Kavanaugh’s
characterization of himself as someone who drank occasionally and sometimes to
excess, but was not a sloppy, belligerent drunk. Whether young men commonly get
into bar fights is irrelevant to the issue of the nominee’s honesty about his
past.
The most extreme version of this line of reasoning is that even if
the accusations against Kavanaugh are true, they do not disqualify him from
being confirmed to the Supreme Court. As writer Rod Dreher wrote on September
17, when the only sexual assault allegation then made public was by Christine
Blasey Ford:
Tweet follows:
I do not understand why
the loutish drunken behavior of a 17 year old high school boy has anything to
tell us about the character of a 53 year old judge. By God’s grace (literally),
I am not the same person I was at 17. This is a terrible standard to establish
in public life.
— Rod Dreher (@roddreher)
September 17, 2018
Dreher is not alone in his position. An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll
released on September 26 revealed that 54 percent of Republicans believed that
Kavanaugh should be confirmed even Blasey Ford’s allegation is true.
By framing Kavanaugh’s nomination as not just a debate about the
conduct and honesty of one man, but about men in general, Republicans have
transformed a narrow question about a nominee’s fitness for the Supreme Court
into a wider social referendum on gender equality and sexual misconduct in
America today. #MeToo put these issues at the heart of the country’s politics,
and now Republicans have twisted them for their own partisan ends. They’re
trying to turn a women’s rights movement into a retrograde battle of the sexes.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.