Saturday, May 16, 2020
We need to prepare for the possibility of Trump rejecting election results
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Inside Trump’s coronavirus meltdown, by Edward Luce for Financial Times
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Trump’s latest effort to gaslight America is falling apart. By Greg Sargent
washingtonpost.com
5 min
View Original
(Alex Brandon, File)
May 11, 2020 at 10:03 AM EDT
The news that the novel coronavirus has invaded President Trump’s inner circle — and that the White House is implementing aggressive testing and tracing to combat it — is a devastating story on an obvious and immediate level, but also on a deeper and longer-lasting one.
Most palpably, it has revealed the sort of glaring double standard that’s catnip to political media: The White House is taking extensive steps to protect Trump and his top advisers with resources that are largely unavailable to the rest of us, in part due to his own dereliction.
But new reporting about the White House’s handling of this points to something more fundamental. How will Trump persuade the country we are returning to a normalcy that makes it safe to resume economic activities when his own advisers are panicked about its invasion of their own spaces, even as they can protect themselves in a way we cannot?
According to CNN, Trump’s advisers grasp that this story has become a deadly problem for them. But note why they have concluded this:
An official said there is extreme sensitivity inside the White House at the current state of affairs with officials recognizing the contradiction in telling states to reopen while the White House enhances protocols to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
The problem isn’t just that this story is revealing that Trump and his advisers benefit from testing and tracing that the rest of us mostly do not enjoy, though that’s damning enough.
It’s also that this shatters the larger illusion Trump is trying to weave with his magical reality-bending powers — that the coronavirus has been so tamed by his stupendous leadership that it’s now safe to reopen the country, setting the stage for an equally spectacular Trump-marshaled comeback.
Virus invades White House
Two White House staffers — Katie Miller, who is an adviser to Vice President Pence, and one of Trump’s valets — have tested positive. Two of Trump’s senior health officials have temporarily quarantined themselves, having interacted with Miller.
Meanwhile, Trump, Pence and their close aides are now tested daily. All White House employees are tested at least weekly. In other words, what you’re seeing unfold inside the White House is a rigorous testing and tracing effort.
“It is scary to go to work,” Kevin Hassett, a senior White House economic adviser, conceded to CBS News. “I think that I’d be a lot safer if I was sitting at home.” Hassett added he’s going to work anyway, because “it’s the time when people have to step up and serve their country.”
But this quote gives away the game. As heroic and self-sacrificing as Hassett’s efforts are supposed to be, the fact remains that he can go to work more safely than millions of Americans across the country can, because he has access to the testing and tracing that they don’t. Yet he’s frightened, anyway.
And Trump, too, is frightened and irked by the coronavirus invasion. This reporting from the New York Times deserves more attention:
A senior administration official said the president was spooked that his valet, who is among those who serve him food, had not been wearing a mask. And he was annoyed to learn that Ms. Miller tested positive and has been growing irritated with people who get too close to him, the official said.
Yet Trump is demanding we all put ourselves in positions just like this one, without the protections he enjoys.
Indeed, even Republicans such as Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.) concede we can’t reopen the country safely without testing dramatically scaled up from what we have now. Trump’s own officials have urged him in vain to lead by launching an ambitious national testing effort to facilitate this reopening.
Epic gaslighting
Over the weekend, Trump unleashed a frantic barrage of messaging that everything is going spectacularly well. Trump claimed it’s “great to see our Country starting to open again” (while corruptly promoting one of his golf courses) and hailed his own “great” handling of the pandemic (nearly 80,000 are dead).
At the same time, Trump is using the White House’s image-making power to push a message of normalcy. He and Pence are holding events with business executives, all without masks, even though those executives are inclined to wear them. This week, Trump will hold an event with governors (surely mask-less) and travel to Philadelphia — which itself is facilitated by the very testing and tracing the rest of us largely lack.
Meanwhile, Fox News personalities started the week by pushing the message that Americans should behave “patriotically” and adopt the “military mindset” to go back to work for the good of the country.
We all know this push is mostly about helping Trump get reelected. But it’s even more despicable when you consider that they are trying to shame Americans into doing this without the protective gear that Trump and his top aides enjoy.
The next step in this epic gaslighting campaign, Axios reports, will be for Trump to begin questioning the death totals, something he’s already done privately. Indeed, as Jonathan Chait notes, some Fox News segments are already pushing this line, so it’s only a matter of time until Trump goes “full death denier.”
Now that Trump and his own advisers are personally frightened of the coronavirus’s invasion of their workspace — and are trying to ward it off with the aggressive testing and tracing that Trump himself has assured us is “overrated” — this has not just revealed a depraved double standard on his part.
It will also make the larger illusion he continues trying to weave a lot harder to sustain. Indeed, that illusion is quite literally collapsing all around him.
Get The Washington Post's five best stories in your inbox every Saturday with Must Reads. Or explore all our email newsletter and alert options here.
Trump’s tweets are a strategy of distraction to obscure a policy of abdication. By Michael Gerson
washingtonpost.com
4 min
View Original
May 11, 2020 at 4:01 PM EDT
In the fourth month of the greatest crisis of his presidency, Donald Trump issued 126 tweets or retweets during a single Sunday.
Other than claiming “great marks” for handling the pandemic — and praising Vice President Pence for praising himself — there was very little on covid-19. Mother’s Day got two mentions. The president attacked CNN’s Brian Stelter, and NBC’s Chuck Todd and ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel. He praised the new head of the Chicago police union and touted the reopening of his Los Angeles golf course.
But most of all, Trump extrapolated the “framing of Michael Flynn” into a deep state plot to destroy his presidency conducted by the FBI, intelligence officials and President Barack Obama. The president now calls this “OBAMAGATE!” and charges his predecessor with the “biggest political crime in American history.” Trump made his case, in part, by retweeting QAnon conspiracy accounts. And he spread the threatening meme: “HOPE YOU HAD FUN INVESTIGATING ME. NOW IT’S MY TURN.”
It is always difficult to determine how much of President Trump’s daily communication results from compulsion and how much results from calculation. But it has been Trump’s unique genius to turn the appearance of mental breakdown into effective political maneuvering. And we are seeing his approach take shape: a strategy of distraction to obscure a policy of abdication.
It is admittedly not easy to distract the attention of the nation from 80,000 covid-19 deaths, a good portion of which were avoidable. Trump’s late and reluctant embrace of sound scientific advice on the pandemic, and his early and enthusiastic undermining and abandonment of that advice, constitute the worst response to a national crisis since Herbert Hoover. Perhaps the worst response to a national crisis since James Buchanan.
The sum of all Trump’s picked fights, childish slights and transgressive tweets is an attempt to divert attention away from a historic fiasco. In pursuit of this goal, being unhinged is a virtue. Irrationality is a rational option.
Previous attempts at more conventional crisis communications failed badly, and revealingly. Recall when Trump tried to give a speech to the nation in March outlining his pandemic response. His remarks were rhetorically flat, poorly delivered, riddled with factual errors and entirely unequal to the moment. As is often the case, a failure of presidential communication revealed a series of deeper, more substantive failures. In the midst of a crisis, the Trump White House could not even produce a middling speech because its policy process is nonexistent; because Trump has chosen morally and intellectually mediocre White House advisers; because the president has no respect for the power of words and is incapable of public empathy or inspiration. And when Trump was given a format better suited to his style — his daily novel coronavirus task force briefings — he regularly revealed profound and disturbing ignorance.
In light of these limitations, a tweetstorm solidifying the hatred and conspiracy thinking of Trump’s core supporters must seem an attractive alternative.
Trump’s refusal to engage in traditional presidential discourse has another possible explanation. His current policy in the coronavirus crisis is not something he would want to describe out loud. Trump is now completely deferring to states — while pressuring them to restart business activity — because he has given up on a federal strategy to ensure universal, high-quality testing and tracing. It is far easier to blame the governors for future deaths and to claim the credit for future economic growth.
Trump seems to have adopted a “let it burn” pandemic strategy that assumes broad infection and high casualties are inevitable on the road to herd immunity. He hints at his approach — describing citizens as “warriors” who may have to sacrifice for the good of the country — but he clearly doesn’t want to make his view plain. So major policy statements by the president, or others in the White House, are not particularly useful. At this stage of the crisis, clarity is Trump’s enemy.
We have seen the complete breakdown of presidential communication on covid-19. But that, it seems, is exactly where Trump wants to be. It is better for him if the country fixates on his conspiratorial madness, rather than focusing on his utter failure and willingness to sacrifice lives.
Get The Washington Post's five best stories in your inbox every Saturday with Must Reads. Or explore all our email newsletter and alert options here.
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right? by Stuart Rothenberg (text only)
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right? by Stuart Rothenberg
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right? - Roll Call
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right?
Seven years later, the GOP’s analysis of the electorate is still a must-read

Posted May 11, 2020 at 3:34pm
ANALYSIS — At least once a year, I look back at the March 2013 Republican National Committee’s “Growth & Opportunity Project,” the party’s post-2012 “autopsy” examining why Republicans were falling behind in their battle against the Democrats.
“Falling behind?” you might ask, after seeing the GOP sweeps of 2014 and 2016 and Donald Trump’s victory. Yes. Barack Obama turned out to be a useful foil for Republicans, but the party continues to have fundamental flaws.
“Republicans have lost the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections,” noted the report, which cited the success of GOP governors and concluded that the party’s “federal wing … is increasingly marginalizing itself.” In 2016, the number of popular-vote losses rose to six of the last seven presidential elections when Trump won the White House.
Focus groups found that the party was viewed as “scary” and “narrow-minded.” Young people, the report continued, increasingly saw the GOP “as totally intolerant of alternative points a view.”
The report, whose authors included former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, Mississippi GOP national committeeman Henry Barbour, Jeb Bush adviser Sally Bradshaw and others, also warned that unless the party successfully appealed to ethnic minorities, the playing field would tilt “even more in the Democratic direction.”
Pushback
Naturally, conservatives from Michelle Malkin to Rush Limbaugh and the Tea Party Express immediately attacked the report’s recommendations and belittled the idea of compromise.
Those “Growth & Opportunity Project” warnings seem almost quaint now, with Trump in the White House. Tolerance and diversity are not exactly high priorities for this president, Republicans on Capitol Hill, or the parties’ grassroots.
The wings of the party represented by the likes of Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Louie Gohmert of Texas, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, and White House senior adviser Stephen Miller and Fox News personality Sean Hannity are very much in control, and previously thoughtful Republicans clearly are afraid to challenge party orthodoxy articulated by the president and his Fox News enforcers.
Shortly after the 2016 election, I wrote a column in The Washington Post about the autopsy, musing about whether it was simply wrong.
I concluded that the RNC report was correct about the evolution of the electorate and the long-term challenges for the GOP, but its timing obviously was amiss. Clearly, Republicans were able to squeeze out one more victory by appealing to conservative whites, and nobody could be sure that Trump couldn’t do that again in 2020, especially with an economy growing and the nation at peace.
I’m sure many conservatives still pooh-pooh the RNC report and its recommendations. They hope Trump can turn out enough whites in 2020 to score another Electoral College victory, even while again losing the popular vote (maybe this time by more than 4 million votes).
That might still work in 2020, but as a long-term strategy, it’s a loser.
Demographic disadvantage
Whites as a percentage of the electorate continue to slide, according to Roper Center data for 2000 and national exit polling in the last four presidential elections. Whites were 81 percent of the electorate in 2000, 77 percent in 2004, 74 percent in 2008, 72 percent in 2012 and 71 percent in 2016.
The white percentage of the electorate is crucial because over the past 20 years, Republican presidential nominees have won whites comfortably, while nonwhites have voted overwhelmingly Democratic.
In 2004, for example, a close presidential contest, George W. Bush won whites by 17 points (58 percent to 41 percent), while John Kerry carried blacks by 77 points, Latinos by 9 points and Asian Americans by 12 points.
In 2016, Trump won whites by 20 points (57 percent to 37 percent), while Hillary Clinton won blacks by 81 points (89 percent to 8 percent) and Latinos and Asians by 38 points each (66 percent to 28 percent and 65 percent to 27 percent, respectively).
If the white percentage of the electorate slips even a point or two — and/or Trump’s margin among whites sinks at all, a distinct possibility given his problems with whites with a college degree — he’ll need to make up the difference by increasing his performance among nonwhite voters, quite a challenge.
In January 2019, a Pew Research Center report suggested that whites will constitute 66.7 percent of eligible voters in 2020, though they are likely to account for a larger percentage of actual voters who cast ballots. That is largely because Latinos turn out at relatively low rates.
But, as a recent Pew study points out, Asian Americans are a growing problem for the GOP. While some Asian groups lean Republican (Vietnamese), others, including Chinese and Indians, strongly favor Democrats. Overall, Asian Americans clearly prefer the Democrats.
Even leaving aside COVID-19 and the subsequent shock to the U.S. economy, the president faces an uphill climb given Democratic enthusiasm and questions about his appeal to suburban voters who backed him in 2016 but defected to Democratic candidates during the 2018 midterms. (See my March 18 column rating the presidential race as leaning to Joe Biden.)
The 2013 RNC autopsy is as relevant as it was seven years ago. If anything, the party is less willing to compromise and less appealing to young Americans and voters of color.
“The Republican Party needs to stop talking to itself,” then-RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said when the autopsy was released. That is still good advice today. But instead, the party has grown even more insular and less appealing to those not already committed to it.
That’s not a recipe for long-term political success as demographics change in the U.S.
Three ratings changes put Senate majority within reach for Democrats