Saturday, May 23, 2020
The Daily 202: More churches rebel against state orders, as Trump reverses course on releasing reopening guidelines
New York Times’ Style Guide Substitutions for “The President Lied”
Friday, May 22, 2020
Opinion | Trump’s entire reelection message amounts to an admission of failure. By Greg Sargent
washingtonpost.com
Opinion | Trump’s entire reelection message amounts to an admission of failure
Greg Sargent
5-7 minutes
May 21, 2020 at 11:35 p.m.
Given his monstrous narcissism and megalomania, it was only a matter of time until President Trump began campaigning for reelection on the notion that his own government has failed him.
Trump’s political advisers have hit on a new strategy to cope with the challenge of running for a second term amid the most severe public health and economic crises in modern times, the Associated Press reports.
That strategy is to run once again as an outsider, which requires using his own government as a foil. Trump advisers tell the AP that Trump will be positioned as the outsider relative to Joe Biden, which you can see in the new label that Trump propagandists have been applying to Biden: “swamp monster.”
But if you dig beneath the surface of this argument, it really amounts to an admission of failure on Trump’s part, if an unwitting one.
Trump’s reelection message actually has two main components to it. The first is the idea that we’re rapidly returning to normalcy — or “transitioning to greatness,” as Trump has recently begun to say.
The interesting revelation reported on by the AP is that this campaign imperative — which was thrust on Trump and his advisers by his spectacular mismanagement of the pandemic — requires him to tacitly (and sometimes openly) attack his own government’s ongoing characterization of it.
To serve the illusion that we’re “transitioning to greatness,” Trump has been urging the country to reopen faster, regardless of whether states, in so doing, defy guidelines set by his own Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. When Trump tweets the command to “REOPEN OUR COUNTRY,” he is saying the word of his own government’s experts and scientists should be defied or, to some extent, ignored.
Anthony S. Fauci, the leading member of Trump’s own coronavirus task force, has urged extreme caution on this front, warning that if government directives are ignored, it could lead to “suffering and death that could be avoided.”
Trump has directly rebuked Fauci for this posture, recently accusing him of wanting to “play all sides of the equation.”
That’s not mere disagreement with Fauci. It’s a claim that Fauci is not representing his own views candidly and is placing his own media image before his mission to faithfully serve in Trump’s government. It’s an accusation of betrayal — at bottom, of him.
Trump cannot fail. He can only be failed.
At times, Trump has made this even more explicit. He recently accused intelligence services of letting him down on the coronavirus, claiming that on Jan. 23, he got a briefing in which he was told that coronavirus was “not a big deal” and was “of no real import,” as Trump put it.
In a deep dive into that episode, the New York Times demolishes this defense. As current and former officials tell it, it’s impossible to get Trump to engage seriously with what the intelligence actually does say:
The president veers off on tangents and getting him back on topic is difficult, they said. He has a short attention span and rarely, if ever, reads intelligence reports, relying instead on conservative media and his friends for information. … Mr. Trump rarely absorbs information that he disagrees with or that runs counter to his worldview, the officials said.
What’s more, at that time, multiple officials throughout the government were, in fact, shrieking warnings about the coronavirus. And Trump continued dithering and failing to take the coronavirus seriously for weeks and weeks after that, so this defense isn’t exonerating in the least.
But again, Trump’s basic claim here is that his government failed him.
That’s galling on its own. But note what Trump is not saying here. He is not pointing to ways in which his own government, under his leadership, actually did scale up an early and robust federal response that actually did succeed in taming the virus.
Instead, here’s merely declaring that the coronavirus has been defeated and that it’s time to reopen, while simultaneously urging for this to happen in a way that leapfrogs his own experts.
When Trump does try to claim his government’s response has been robust — such as with his constant hyping of our substandard testing — he’s dissembling and lying.
At bottom, all of this amounts to an admission of failure. And this is even more starkly obvious on the economic front.
Yes, Trump is to blame
The second major component of Trump’s reelection message is that, having built the greatest economy in the known history of the universe, he will do so again. This messaging is directly linked to Trump’s insistence on reopening, regardless of the risks, as the AP demonstrates:
“The first step in getting our economy booming again is to begin to reopen,” said Trump campaign spokeswoman Sarah Matthews. “Americans know the economy reached unprecedented heights under President Trump’s leadership before it was artificially interrupted by the coronavirus, and he will build it back up a second time.”
Nor is it right to say that the coronavirus “artificially interrupted” Trump’s glorious economic record. Trump’s failures are in no small part why the coronavirus rampaged out of control, requiring a more stringent economic lockdown than might otherwise have been necessary.
But regardless, the very use of this talking point is itself an admission of failure. Trump would never concede that he bears any blame for that failure. But we are under zero obligation to go along with that.
Read more:
Trump in Private: I Wish I Could Run Against Hillary Again / Daily Beast
thedailybeast.com
Trump in Private: I Wish I Could Run Against Hillary Again
By Hanna Trudo and Asawin Suebsaeng
9-12 minutes
May. 21, 2020 10:52AM ET
In 2016, Donald Trump and his campaign staff found themselves up against a Democratic nominee who was running under a cloud of corruption allegations, family liabilities, a longtime “establishment” image, health and wellness questions, personal baggage related to sexual-misconduct claims, and politicized inquiries on Capitol Hill.
In 2020, they want to do it all over again. But this time, Team Trump faces a presumptive Democratic nominee who appears, at least thus far, significantly less vulnerable to those attacks that worked so well on Hillary Clinton. In poll after poll—both public and internal campaign variety—former Vice President Joe Biden has maintained leads over President Trump, including in several key battleground states.
The advantage has persisted as Biden’s prospects seemed doomed, as Trump’s standing momentarily brightened, as the attacks have grown more vicious, and as both men were taken off the trail because of the coronavirus pandemic. The steadiness has gotten to the point that Biden’s own confidants are now increasingly confident that Trump simply won’t be able to re-use the playbook that got him the White House four years ago.
“Joe Biden’s not Hillary Clinton, thank God,” one senior Biden adviser said about any attempt from Team Trump to paint him as a Hillary clone.
It’s also prompted some Trump lieutenants, and even the president himself, to start practically longing for the good ol’ days of having Clinton as their foe. As recently as last month, Trump privately joked how great it would be if Biden ultimately didn’t secure the nomination this summer and Clinton would have to step in, so that he could beat her harder than he did last time around, according to two sources close to the president.
“It would be nice, for sure, if we were running against a replica of Hillary,” a senior Trump administration official said. “But only Hillary Clinton is Hillary Clinton.”
It’s not as if the president and his team haven’t been trying to meld the last two Democratic candidates together. In interviews with half a dozen Trump aides in the administration and his re-election effort, each said that there was a concerted campaign to “make Biden the new Hillary,” in the words of one campaign official, whether it be by accusing him of engaging in shady foreign dealings, charging him with a embracing a culture of “corruption,” or portraying him as an immigrant-loving elitist.
“Joe Biden just told his wealthy liberal donors that Trump supporters are a bunch of racist xenophobes,” the president’s campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted last month. “Biden is picking up right where Hillary left off!”
Beyond portraying him as a Clinton clone, the president’s top political advisers have also gone after Biden on new fronts, first and foremost his positions and record on China. However, with the past few months having been dominated by the coronavirus and a collapsing American economy, the punches have proven harder to land, and some Republicans are worried that they may never will.
Part of Biden’s advantage, they concede, is that he has never been perceived as a boogeyman in conservative circles like Clinton was for decades prior to Trump’s arrival on the national scene.
“While Biden has universal name-ID, unlike Hillary Clinton he hasn’t spent the last two decades as the principal boogeyman among conservatives, and beyond that, he’s generally been pretty undefined politically, other than the fact that he was Barack Obama’s VP,” said a Republican close to the Trump campaign. “For now, Americans are focused on the virus. I think that by the summer, people will start paying more attention to the race between Biden and Trump—and you’ll be seeing his open wounds get picked at more and more.”
But for some Democrats, the simplest explanation as to why Biden is proving more immune (at least for now) to the Trump campaign playbook is chromosomal.
Related in Politics
“Donald Trump's attack on Hillary in 2016 ranged from calling her nasty, crooked, and unlikable,” said Patti Solis Doyle, Clinton's 2008 campaign manager and longtime confidant. “His tactics ranged from parading women who had accused her husband of various sexual assaults; to leading chants of ‘Lock Her Up’; to stalking her at a debate. None of these tactics will work on Biden because.... wait for it....HE’S A MAN! Trump is going to have to dig deeper in his sleazy bag of tricks to attack his opponent this time around.”
Clearly frustrated by the durable nature of Biden’s campaign to date, Trumpworld has, in recent days, accelerated the attacks in visceral ways. Trump, his team, and his two eldest sons have taunted Biden with unfounded charges that he’s mentally deteriorating, a pedophile, and “China’s puppet.” Congressional Republicans have pushed subpoenas seeking to investigate a firm that did work for a Ukrainian company where Biden’s son Hunter sat on the board. And the broader Trump political apparatus has pushed accusations, unsupported by any available evidence, that Biden was involved in an elaborate effort to spy on Trump’s former adviser Michael Flynn.
Through it all, Biden’s inner circle has remained adamant in adhering to the plan they believe worked best in the Democratic primary: only engaging minimally when Trump and his allies attack.
“This is his pattern,” the former vice president stated in a forum with Yahoo News, already appearing exasperated at the mere mention of things like “Obamagate” before repeating the word “diversion” five times in rapid succession. “Don’t speak to whatever the issues before us are. My God! ‘Obamagate.’”
Nearly five minutes into the topic, Biden appeared to grow more frustrated with his opponent’s political approach, spitballing about the pettiness and general absurdity of Trump’s latest crusades.
“What he’s trying to do is get something going on the internet,” Biden said, answering a follow-up question about the president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., sharing an online meme about a baseless insinuation that the former vice president has engaged in pedophilia. “It’s sick! It’s sick! It’s sick!... I don’t want to get down in the mud with these guys.”
Though Biden’s hesitance to mud-fight has worked so far, for some veterans of past campaigns, the strategy carries risk. Four years ago, Clinton took pains not to dirty herself trying to defend ongoing attacks about her use of a private email server at the State Department, or the death of a United States ambassador who was killed by an Islamic militant group while working in Benghazi, Libya. During one general election debate, where Trump hovered within striking distance, she famously didn’t engage.
“I think Hillary regrets a lot of that,” a former top adviser to Clinton said, speaking broadly about her hesitance to take Trump head-on over a variety of issues. “People can pretend all day that this whole not responding thing is the high road and the way to go, but it’s not.”
“Democrats need to understand that this is a real fight,” the former adviser went on. “And stop pretending that we can normalize this by offering some other type of positive politics that’s going to get us through it. It’s not. You have to hit this guy, you have to hit him harder.”
Still, Biden and his top allies believe there are stronger benefits to simply downplaying any outlandish remarks and turning the attention back to Trump’s record in the White House. Indeed, some Biden campaign officials delight at the prospect of Team Trump dusting off their 2016 playbook, saying that unlike 2016, when Clinton’s team struggled to anticipate the unorthodox and bombastic approach, they have an edge knowing what to expect this time around.
“He’s been at it all year long,” Mike Donilon, the Biden campaign’s chief strategist, said on a recent briefing call with reporters about the president’s attempts to trash the former VP. "I understand that the president and his allies will undertake every effort to go after the vice president and try and change the subject, but first of all, I would say, this isn’t new.”
The thinking among some in Bidenworld is that, unlike Clinton, who only competed against Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in 2016, Biden had to slug it out against a series of formidable challengers during a hard-fought primary. Trump’s attacks, including on his son Hunter Biden’s involvement with the Ukrainian company Burisma, didn’t stick then and won’t work now.
“He came after him in the primary. He made a real effort to try to stop him there,” Donilon said. “One of the things that’s been underestimated about the vice president from the beginning is how strong an image he has with the American people. He has held up incredibly well. I think he’s been attacked if not more than anybody else, pretty much in the same league. And he’s held up very well through all of it.”
There also is the matter of the political landscape at hand. The coronavirus pandemic has put the campaign on the backburner and prompted a nationwide debate about Trump’s capacity to handle a national crisis. For Biden, it’s been an opportunity. He released a plan for tackling coronavirus in mid-April, and has emphasized a coordinated strategy—from policy prescriptions to messaging and social media roll-outs—centered around the need to believe and elevate scientists, who Trump publicly downplays. In doing that, the campaign sees Biden’s handling of the pandemic as one of the strongest lines of defense against Trump, and a surefire way to rebuff the idea that he is a Clinton reincarnation.
“It’s going to fall on deaf ears,” said the senior Biden adviser. “It worked very well on Hillary because a lot of people didn’t like Hillary. It was primarily because of her unpopularity.”
—with reporting by Sam Stein
Tuesday, May 19, 2020
Anything But The Truth: Obamagate, The New World Order, and an Abdication of Responsibility — themuckrake
May 18
Written By Jared Yates Sexton
5-6 minutes
Original at The Muckrake
As America speeds past 90,000 dead of the coronavirus and the economy continues its disastrous freefall, Donald Trump and Fox News have rolled out their newest distraction: Obamagate. This follows on the heels of the Department of Justice flaunting its lawlessness by dropping charges against disgraced General Mike Flynn, clearing the way for a new offensive strategy of claiming that former president Barack Obama and, by extension, Vice-President Joe Biden, were involved in an unconstitutional investigation against Donald Trump and his assorted cadre of criminals.
The narrative is in full force. Every night on Fox is filled with one story of Obamagate after another, the stories growing more and more hyperbolic by the day. It’s something to talk about besides the disastrous mishandling of the pandemic and it serves multiple purposes, including scapegoating the failure, harming Biden’s campaign for the presidency, and dog-whistling to the assorted paranoid groups that the Republican Party now relies on as their base.
This conspiracy mongering is nothing new for Trump or Fox News. Having begun the descent in 2008 and Barack Obama’s election, the pairing has consistently questioned everything from Obama’s birthplace to whether he is the leader of an anti-American cabal obsessed with bringing the empire to its knees. Fox has continually peddled one story after another angling to paint Obama as a traitor and a danger to America, while Trump has done everything from calling him “dumb,” “weak,” and “the founder of ISIS.”
Of course, Birtherism was a conspiracy born of white supremacy, racial paranoia, and the troubling American past of identity and citizenship. The other charges are offshoots of the New World Order conspiracy theory that posits that white Christian America is under attack from shadowy, satanic operatives outside the country working with traitors within.
Obamagate, like the Deep State and Qanon narratives, is intended to pluck all of these different wires at once, presenting a mythical vision of an America that is unbeatable, indestructible, great, if you will, and perfect. An empire that has God’s favor at all times and only falters when elements within the country, whether traitors or “weak” individuals betraying God’s will, undermine the final goal.
Now, in the midst of a generational pandemic and an economic crisis rivaling the Great Depression, Obamagate is meant to achieve multiple goals. First, it changes the story from the coronavirus to a constructed narrative meant to short-circuit television news coverage, entice spectacle-addicted viewers, draw in networks determined to seem fair and balanced, and give supporters a one-word explanation for why their president has failed so spectacularly. Second, it draws Joe Biden, Trump’s opponent in the November election, into a complex and disgusting web of charges that could hurt his electoral chances while supplying a damning narrative to the media covering him, ala Hillary Clinton’s emails in 2016. And finally, Obamagate activates the myth of American exceptionalism, making the case that we have faltered in the face of this test not because Donald Trump has failed to lead, but because elements within the country are acting against the national interest.
Soon, Fox and Trump will escalate their plan to blame China and insinuate the coronavirus was a biological weapon. We’ve already seen Trump infer that his media critics and Democratic rivals are in league with China. They will push this dangerous conspiracy theory as far as they can, possibly bringing Obama and Biden and anyone else fitting their designs into the public for show trials or public spectacles. The summer and early fall, as the numbers of the dead continue piling up, could be an ugly moment in American history as this scorched earth strategy unfurls.
Jared Yates Sexton is the author of American Rule: How A Nation Conquered The World But Failed Its People, available for pre-order from Dutton/Penguin-Random House. His work has appeared in The New York Times, The New Republic, The Daily Beast, Politico, and elsewhere. Currently he serves as an associate professor of writing at Georgia Southern University and is the co-host of The Muckrake Podcast.
Saturday, May 16, 2020
We need to prepare for the possibility of Trump rejecting election results
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Inside Trump’s coronavirus meltdown, by Edward Luce for Financial Times
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Trump’s latest effort to gaslight America is falling apart. By Greg Sargent
washingtonpost.com
5 min
View Original
(Alex Brandon, File)
May 11, 2020 at 10:03 AM EDT
The news that the novel coronavirus has invaded President Trump’s inner circle — and that the White House is implementing aggressive testing and tracing to combat it — is a devastating story on an obvious and immediate level, but also on a deeper and longer-lasting one.
Most palpably, it has revealed the sort of glaring double standard that’s catnip to political media: The White House is taking extensive steps to protect Trump and his top advisers with resources that are largely unavailable to the rest of us, in part due to his own dereliction.
But new reporting about the White House’s handling of this points to something more fundamental. How will Trump persuade the country we are returning to a normalcy that makes it safe to resume economic activities when his own advisers are panicked about its invasion of their own spaces, even as they can protect themselves in a way we cannot?
According to CNN, Trump’s advisers grasp that this story has become a deadly problem for them. But note why they have concluded this:
An official said there is extreme sensitivity inside the White House at the current state of affairs with officials recognizing the contradiction in telling states to reopen while the White House enhances protocols to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
The problem isn’t just that this story is revealing that Trump and his advisers benefit from testing and tracing that the rest of us mostly do not enjoy, though that’s damning enough.
It’s also that this shatters the larger illusion Trump is trying to weave with his magical reality-bending powers — that the coronavirus has been so tamed by his stupendous leadership that it’s now safe to reopen the country, setting the stage for an equally spectacular Trump-marshaled comeback.
Virus invades White House
Two White House staffers — Katie Miller, who is an adviser to Vice President Pence, and one of Trump’s valets — have tested positive. Two of Trump’s senior health officials have temporarily quarantined themselves, having interacted with Miller.
Meanwhile, Trump, Pence and their close aides are now tested daily. All White House employees are tested at least weekly. In other words, what you’re seeing unfold inside the White House is a rigorous testing and tracing effort.
“It is scary to go to work,” Kevin Hassett, a senior White House economic adviser, conceded to CBS News. “I think that I’d be a lot safer if I was sitting at home.” Hassett added he’s going to work anyway, because “it’s the time when people have to step up and serve their country.”
But this quote gives away the game. As heroic and self-sacrificing as Hassett’s efforts are supposed to be, the fact remains that he can go to work more safely than millions of Americans across the country can, because he has access to the testing and tracing that they don’t. Yet he’s frightened, anyway.
And Trump, too, is frightened and irked by the coronavirus invasion. This reporting from the New York Times deserves more attention:
A senior administration official said the president was spooked that his valet, who is among those who serve him food, had not been wearing a mask. And he was annoyed to learn that Ms. Miller tested positive and has been growing irritated with people who get too close to him, the official said.
Yet Trump is demanding we all put ourselves in positions just like this one, without the protections he enjoys.
Indeed, even Republicans such as Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.) concede we can’t reopen the country safely without testing dramatically scaled up from what we have now. Trump’s own officials have urged him in vain to lead by launching an ambitious national testing effort to facilitate this reopening.
Epic gaslighting
Over the weekend, Trump unleashed a frantic barrage of messaging that everything is going spectacularly well. Trump claimed it’s “great to see our Country starting to open again” (while corruptly promoting one of his golf courses) and hailed his own “great” handling of the pandemic (nearly 80,000 are dead).
At the same time, Trump is using the White House’s image-making power to push a message of normalcy. He and Pence are holding events with business executives, all without masks, even though those executives are inclined to wear them. This week, Trump will hold an event with governors (surely mask-less) and travel to Philadelphia — which itself is facilitated by the very testing and tracing the rest of us largely lack.
Meanwhile, Fox News personalities started the week by pushing the message that Americans should behave “patriotically” and adopt the “military mindset” to go back to work for the good of the country.
We all know this push is mostly about helping Trump get reelected. But it’s even more despicable when you consider that they are trying to shame Americans into doing this without the protective gear that Trump and his top aides enjoy.
The next step in this epic gaslighting campaign, Axios reports, will be for Trump to begin questioning the death totals, something he’s already done privately. Indeed, as Jonathan Chait notes, some Fox News segments are already pushing this line, so it’s only a matter of time until Trump goes “full death denier.”
Now that Trump and his own advisers are personally frightened of the coronavirus’s invasion of their workspace — and are trying to ward it off with the aggressive testing and tracing that Trump himself has assured us is “overrated” — this has not just revealed a depraved double standard on his part.
It will also make the larger illusion he continues trying to weave a lot harder to sustain. Indeed, that illusion is quite literally collapsing all around him.
Get The Washington Post's five best stories in your inbox every Saturday with Must Reads. Or explore all our email newsletter and alert options here.
Trump’s tweets are a strategy of distraction to obscure a policy of abdication. By Michael Gerson
washingtonpost.com
4 min
View Original
May 11, 2020 at 4:01 PM EDT
In the fourth month of the greatest crisis of his presidency, Donald Trump issued 126 tweets or retweets during a single Sunday.
Other than claiming “great marks” for handling the pandemic — and praising Vice President Pence for praising himself — there was very little on covid-19. Mother’s Day got two mentions. The president attacked CNN’s Brian Stelter, and NBC’s Chuck Todd and ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel. He praised the new head of the Chicago police union and touted the reopening of his Los Angeles golf course.
But most of all, Trump extrapolated the “framing of Michael Flynn” into a deep state plot to destroy his presidency conducted by the FBI, intelligence officials and President Barack Obama. The president now calls this “OBAMAGATE!” and charges his predecessor with the “biggest political crime in American history.” Trump made his case, in part, by retweeting QAnon conspiracy accounts. And he spread the threatening meme: “HOPE YOU HAD FUN INVESTIGATING ME. NOW IT’S MY TURN.”
It is always difficult to determine how much of President Trump’s daily communication results from compulsion and how much results from calculation. But it has been Trump’s unique genius to turn the appearance of mental breakdown into effective political maneuvering. And we are seeing his approach take shape: a strategy of distraction to obscure a policy of abdication.
It is admittedly not easy to distract the attention of the nation from 80,000 covid-19 deaths, a good portion of which were avoidable. Trump’s late and reluctant embrace of sound scientific advice on the pandemic, and his early and enthusiastic undermining and abandonment of that advice, constitute the worst response to a national crisis since Herbert Hoover. Perhaps the worst response to a national crisis since James Buchanan.
The sum of all Trump’s picked fights, childish slights and transgressive tweets is an attempt to divert attention away from a historic fiasco. In pursuit of this goal, being unhinged is a virtue. Irrationality is a rational option.
Previous attempts at more conventional crisis communications failed badly, and revealingly. Recall when Trump tried to give a speech to the nation in March outlining his pandemic response. His remarks were rhetorically flat, poorly delivered, riddled with factual errors and entirely unequal to the moment. As is often the case, a failure of presidential communication revealed a series of deeper, more substantive failures. In the midst of a crisis, the Trump White House could not even produce a middling speech because its policy process is nonexistent; because Trump has chosen morally and intellectually mediocre White House advisers; because the president has no respect for the power of words and is incapable of public empathy or inspiration. And when Trump was given a format better suited to his style — his daily novel coronavirus task force briefings — he regularly revealed profound and disturbing ignorance.
In light of these limitations, a tweetstorm solidifying the hatred and conspiracy thinking of Trump’s core supporters must seem an attractive alternative.
Trump’s refusal to engage in traditional presidential discourse has another possible explanation. His current policy in the coronavirus crisis is not something he would want to describe out loud. Trump is now completely deferring to states — while pressuring them to restart business activity — because he has given up on a federal strategy to ensure universal, high-quality testing and tracing. It is far easier to blame the governors for future deaths and to claim the credit for future economic growth.
Trump seems to have adopted a “let it burn” pandemic strategy that assumes broad infection and high casualties are inevitable on the road to herd immunity. He hints at his approach — describing citizens as “warriors” who may have to sacrifice for the good of the country — but he clearly doesn’t want to make his view plain. So major policy statements by the president, or others in the White House, are not particularly useful. At this stage of the crisis, clarity is Trump’s enemy.
We have seen the complete breakdown of presidential communication on covid-19. But that, it seems, is exactly where Trump wants to be. It is better for him if the country fixates on his conspiratorial madness, rather than focusing on his utter failure and willingness to sacrifice lives.
Get The Washington Post's five best stories in your inbox every Saturday with Must Reads. Or explore all our email newsletter and alert options here.
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right? by Stuart Rothenberg (text only)
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right? by Stuart Rothenberg
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right? - Roll Call
Will 2020 be the year the RNC’s ‘autopsy’ was right?
Seven years later, the GOP’s analysis of the electorate is still a must-read
Posted May 11, 2020 at 3:34pm
ANALYSIS — At least once a year, I look back at the March 2013 Republican National Committee’s “Growth & Opportunity Project,” the party’s post-2012 “autopsy” examining why Republicans were falling behind in their battle against the Democrats.
“Falling behind?” you might ask, after seeing the GOP sweeps of 2014 and 2016 and Donald Trump’s victory. Yes. Barack Obama turned out to be a useful foil for Republicans, but the party continues to have fundamental flaws.
“Republicans have lost the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections,” noted the report, which cited the success of GOP governors and concluded that the party’s “federal wing … is increasingly marginalizing itself.” In 2016, the number of popular-vote losses rose to six of the last seven presidential elections when Trump won the White House.
Focus groups found that the party was viewed as “scary” and “narrow-minded.” Young people, the report continued, increasingly saw the GOP “as totally intolerant of alternative points a view.”
The report, whose authors included former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, Mississippi GOP national committeeman Henry Barbour, Jeb Bush adviser Sally Bradshaw and others, also warned that unless the party successfully appealed to ethnic minorities, the playing field would tilt “even more in the Democratic direction.”
Pushback
Naturally, conservatives from Michelle Malkin to Rush Limbaugh and the Tea Party Express immediately attacked the report’s recommendations and belittled the idea of compromise.
Those “Growth & Opportunity Project” warnings seem almost quaint now, with Trump in the White House. Tolerance and diversity are not exactly high priorities for this president, Republicans on Capitol Hill, or the parties’ grassroots.
The wings of the party represented by the likes of Reps. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Louie Gohmert of Texas, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, and White House senior adviser Stephen Miller and Fox News personality Sean Hannity are very much in control, and previously thoughtful Republicans clearly are afraid to challenge party orthodoxy articulated by the president and his Fox News enforcers.
Shortly after the 2016 election, I wrote a column in The Washington Post about the autopsy, musing about whether it was simply wrong.
I concluded that the RNC report was correct about the evolution of the electorate and the long-term challenges for the GOP, but its timing obviously was amiss. Clearly, Republicans were able to squeeze out one more victory by appealing to conservative whites, and nobody could be sure that Trump couldn’t do that again in 2020, especially with an economy growing and the nation at peace.
I’m sure many conservatives still pooh-pooh the RNC report and its recommendations. They hope Trump can turn out enough whites in 2020 to score another Electoral College victory, even while again losing the popular vote (maybe this time by more than 4 million votes).
That might still work in 2020, but as a long-term strategy, it’s a loser.
Demographic disadvantage
Whites as a percentage of the electorate continue to slide, according to Roper Center data for 2000 and national exit polling in the last four presidential elections. Whites were 81 percent of the electorate in 2000, 77 percent in 2004, 74 percent in 2008, 72 percent in 2012 and 71 percent in 2016.
The white percentage of the electorate is crucial because over the past 20 years, Republican presidential nominees have won whites comfortably, while nonwhites have voted overwhelmingly Democratic.
In 2004, for example, a close presidential contest, George W. Bush won whites by 17 points (58 percent to 41 percent), while John Kerry carried blacks by 77 points, Latinos by 9 points and Asian Americans by 12 points.
In 2016, Trump won whites by 20 points (57 percent to 37 percent), while Hillary Clinton won blacks by 81 points (89 percent to 8 percent) and Latinos and Asians by 38 points each (66 percent to 28 percent and 65 percent to 27 percent, respectively).
If the white percentage of the electorate slips even a point or two — and/or Trump’s margin among whites sinks at all, a distinct possibility given his problems with whites with a college degree — he’ll need to make up the difference by increasing his performance among nonwhite voters, quite a challenge.
In January 2019, a Pew Research Center report suggested that whites will constitute 66.7 percent of eligible voters in 2020, though they are likely to account for a larger percentage of actual voters who cast ballots. That is largely because Latinos turn out at relatively low rates.
But, as a recent Pew study points out, Asian Americans are a growing problem for the GOP. While some Asian groups lean Republican (Vietnamese), others, including Chinese and Indians, strongly favor Democrats. Overall, Asian Americans clearly prefer the Democrats.
Even leaving aside COVID-19 and the subsequent shock to the U.S. economy, the president faces an uphill climb given Democratic enthusiasm and questions about his appeal to suburban voters who backed him in 2016 but defected to Democratic candidates during the 2018 midterms. (See my March 18 column rating the presidential race as leaning to Joe Biden.)
The 2013 RNC autopsy is as relevant as it was seven years ago. If anything, the party is less willing to compromise and less appealing to young Americans and voters of color.
“The Republican Party needs to stop talking to itself,” then-RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said when the autopsy was released. That is still good advice today. But instead, the party has grown even more insular and less appealing to those not already committed to it.
That’s not a recipe for long-term political success as demographics change in the U.S.
Three ratings changes put Senate majority within reach for Democrats